ICD-10 To Be Delayed Indefinitely – Never Mind!

Robert Laszewski

Posted 2/14/12 on Health Policy and Marketplace Review

After years of telling us they are serious this time and everyone in the health care system had better be ready on time to implement the new disease coding system, CMS said today the whole project is going to be delayed indefinitely.

The new ICD-10 system requires payers and providers to convert from the old system of 13,000 codes to the new system of 68,000 codes.

All payers and providers were supposed to be ready by October 1, 2013. The acting CMS Administrator said, “There is a concern that folks cannot get their work done around meaningful use [of information technology], ICD-10 implementation, and be ready for [insurance] exchanges. So we decided to listen and be responsive.”

Apparently, a new timeline will be developed through a “rule making process.”

Fine, but that has not been the message for months now and lots of people have spent lots of money for apparently no good reason.

The concerns that particularly physicians would not be ready on time have not been minor. CMS conducted a survey between January and March of 2011 that clearly showed there were big problems ahead. But in the year since that survey, they continued to tell stakeholders to keep going ahead full speed, spending big money to be ready.

But in the last few weeks, the American Medical Association has been sounding the alarm–their people wouldn’t be ready.

Sounds like the lowest common denominator in the health care system wins out.

Here are the results from a survey CMS conducted from January to March of 2011 by type of industry participant. AHIP is the insurance industry trade association, HBMA and AAPC are associations of industry coding and billing providers, ACP is the American College of Physicians and the AMA is the American Medical Association. The survey also measured readiness for the Version 5100 standards for electronic health transactions that were effective in January 2012, but for which enforcement has been delayed until March 31, 2012.
It was obvious a year ago that the docs (ACP and AMA) weren’t going to be ready yet CMS kept telling everyone to keep spending big money on all of this.

About Brian Klepper

Brian Klepper is a health care analyst and the Chief Development Officer of WeCare TLC onsite clinics.
This entry was posted in Analytics, Health Care Cost, Innovation, Physicians, Policy/Law/Regulation, Politics, Quality, Reform, Tools and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to ICD-10 To Be Delayed Indefinitely – Never Mind!

  1. Al Lewis says:

    Well, as long as they are delaying it, how hard would it be to add an “R” to the end of codes when it’s a rule-out diagnosis? Someone comes into the office who’s 50 overweight, etc. The doc tests for diabetes. If the patient has diabetes they get coded (in the ICD9s) 250. if the patient has NO diabetes, they get coded 250.

    This hugely complicates many people’s lives, especially in a move to ACOs or PCMH’s where knowing how many diabetes one has is critical, and where testing is encouraged.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s